Re: ia64/unstable: FTBFS: needs ocamlopt
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:28:04PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> Hello calmers ;-),
>
> What we are supposed to do with FTBFS like #483280, #483307, and similar where
> ocamlopt binary is just not available on these particular architectures, in
> that case IA-64 ? Should we just set the severity to important as Luk Claes
> did for #483280 and wait for upstream to provide support for IA-64 or should
> we remove ia64 from Architecture: list ?
>
> By the way, I'd like to thank Stefano and Sylvain for improving the (my;-) ara
> package and *documenting* that in README.Debian-source! I'm already a DD, so
> I can upload myself, but I'd love to co-maint/co-develop it together.
Just jumping in, but these packages are RC-buggy, and the policy says
what to do with them, no ? I think the correct severity is grave, fails
to follow policy.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: