[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ia64/unstable: FTBFS: needs ocamlopt

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 22:28:04 +0300, George Danchev wrote:

> What we are supposed to do with FTBFS like #483280, #483307, and similar where 
> ocamlopt binary is just not available on these particular architectures, in 
> that case IA-64 ? Should we just set the severity to important as Luk Claes 
> did for  #483280 and wait for upstream to provide support for IA-64 or should 
> we remove ia64 from Architecture: list ?
Ignore or close them, IMO.


Reply to: