Re: ia64/unstable: FTBFS: needs ocamlopt
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 22:28:04 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> What we are supposed to do with FTBFS like #483280, #483307, and similar where
> ocamlopt binary is just not available on these particular architectures, in
> that case IA-64 ? Should we just set the severity to important as Luk Claes
> did for #483280 and wait for upstream to provide support for IA-64 or should
> we remove ia64 from Architecture: list ?
Ignore or close them, IMO.