[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Broken builds on backports.org



On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 09:59:42AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> But I never meant anything else than (= ${binary:Version})...

OK then ...

> I propose to change, for packages generated in the ocaml source package, 
> dependencies like:
> > ocaml-base-nox (=${binary:Version}), ocaml-base-nox-${F:OCamlABI}
> to:
> > ocaml-base-nox (=${binary:Version})
> 
> Note that I really don't understand why there is redundant dependency like 
> this in current ocaml package.

In fact, it is not clear to me either, so probably it is just a leftover
waiting to be fixed. When doing such changes remember that you have to
change debian/control.in.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: