[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFS] unison2.13.16



Hello,

On 10-04-2008, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:
>
> --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:12:34AM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>> I have a unison2.13.16 package, ready for upload, in our svn.
>> svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-ocaml-maint/trunk/packages/unison2.13.16=
> /trunk
>
>> Does someone have the time to do the upload?
>
> I was willing to, but there is some buggyness to be fixed first:
>
>   $ sudo dpkg -i *deb   # did twice, so it is not a matter of order
>   (Reading database ... 293878 files and directories currently installed.)
>   Unpacking unison2.13.16 (from unison2.13.16_2.13.16-1_i386.deb) ...
>   dpkg: error processing unison2.13.16_2.13.16-1_i386.deb (--install):
>    trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/unison-2.13.16', which is also in package =
> unison
>   dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
>   Unpacking unison2.13.16-gtk (from unison2.13.16-gtk_2.13.16-1_i386.deb) .=
>=2E.
>   dpkg: error processing unison2.13.16-gtk_2.13.16-1_i386.deb (--install):
>    trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/unison-2.13.16-gtk', which is also in pack=
> age unison-gtk
>   dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
>   Errors were encountered while processing:
>    unison2.13.16_2.13.16-1_i386.deb
>    unison2.13.16-gtk_2.13.16-1_i386.deb
>

Indeed, you are right... I don't have the error since i am preparing the
next version (and in this case i don't have unison-2.13.16 in unison
package). I need to add a conflict unison (<= 2.13.16) to my package. I
will do it.

> BTW, I understand that we currently need 2 version of unison in the
> archive: fine. But what about the third we have in the repository:
>
>   zack@aquarium:/home/srv/debian/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages$ ls |grep unison
>   unison
>   unison2.13.16
>   unison2.9.1
>
> can we get rid of one of them?
>

I have asked for a removal of unison2.9.1 since a long time in the
archive. I keep it in our svn, until lenny is published (because
unison2.9.1 is in etch). 

Regards,
Sylvain Le Gall


Reply to: