Re: [Fwd: [Caml-list] OCaml version 3.10.2 released]
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:18:36PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Note that I didn't say that there is no ABI change: I've asked if this
> is the case on the caml mailing list (no answer), and I haven't tested
> that by myself. Personally I expect that there has been an ABI change
> also this time, due to some magic number change or something like that.
Understood. I wonder if there is a set of mechanical tests that would
give this answer with high confidence?
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
Reply to: