On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:29:31PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > arch-independant packages are not rebuilt by binary NMUs, so you should
> > ignore those packages in the script.
> Is this correct? It doesn't seem to me: a package containing only
> .cmo/.cmi/.cma (ie. bytecode objects) and text files is
> arch-independant, isn't it? However, it does need to be rebuilt on
> binary NMUs... or maybe I am missing something?
Wait, our packages containing .cmo/.cmi/.cma usually are arch: any, take
for example -dev packages on non-native archs. So I think in practice
your case apply only to packages which are indeed arch:all, and indeed
we can't rely on binNMU for that. Nevertheless I think there are quite a
few among ours. Can you please provide a list?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature