Re: binNMUs for the OCaml transition

[Stéphane Glondu <steph@glondu.net>]

Julien Cristau a écrit :
>> Note that all architectures are not listed for each package: I took  
>> archs where at least one binary package exists (or all if one  
>> arch-independant binary package exists).
>>
> arch-independant packages are not rebuilt by binary NMUs, so you should
> ignore those packages in the script.

Is this correct? It doesn't seem to me: a package containing only
.cmo/.cmi/.cma (ie. bytecode objects) and text files is
arch-independant, isn't it? However, it does need to be rebuilt on
binary NMUs... or maybe I am missing something?

Expanding "all" to all architecture might be unnecessary, though: a
"reference" architecture should be sufficient.


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane