On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:41:39PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Ok, I took it into account.
Wonderful, thanks.
> The new (and hopefully definitive) request is at:
> http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/binNMU.txt
It looks sane to me.
The only doubt I've is: you put dep-wait on +b1, in doing so you're
assuming that +b1 is the result of the binNMU *we* are requesting,
right? So, in theory, this can screw up if some other binNMU has been
made for other reasons in the involved package. I don't think this is
any serious problem, as the dep-wait will be added manually AFAIU, and
the release managers can check whether they need to bump +b1 to +b2 or
something such.
Can please someone else have a look at the list?, just for the sake of
redundancy ...
This afternoon I will forward it as a binNMU request on -release.
Many thanks again to Stéphane for the script!
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature