On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:37:01AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> > Yes in principle, but why we need a new empty package? Can't we just add
> > the provides to ocaml-base-nox? It won't be possible for any bytecode
> > OCaml program to use bytecode objects without that package, so why
> > looking for a new one?
> I agree with you but we should also think of native dynlinking, which
> shouldn't require ocaml-base...
Good point, I agree that for that we would need a new empty package
then.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature