Re: new behaviour of lintian on ocamlrun scripts

To: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: new behaviour of lintian on ocamlrun scripts
From: Eric Cooper <ecc@cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:47:53 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080109214753.GA4659@stratocaster.home>
Mail-followup-to: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080109213920.GC3637@free.fr>
References: <[🔎] 20080109212034.GB3637@free.fr> <[🔎] 20080109212424.GB4301@patate.is-a-geek.org> <[🔎] 20080109213920.GC3637@free.fr>

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:39:20PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Right. So, it should be
> 
> ocaml-base(-nox)?-(\d\.)+ 

Shouldn't this be
    ocaml-base(-nox)?-(\d|\.)+
or
    ocaml-base(-nox)?-[\d.]+

-- 
Eric Cooper             e c c @ c m u . e d u

Reply to:

References:
- new behaviour of lintian on ocamlrun scripts
  - From: Ralf Treinen <treinen@free.fr>
- Re: new behaviour of lintian on ocamlrun scripts
  - From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Re: new behaviour of lintian on ocamlrun scripts
  - From: Ralf Treinen <treinen@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Processing of bibtex2html_1.89-1_amd64.changes
Next by Date: bibtex2html_1.89-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Previous by thread: Re: new behaviour of lintian on ocamlrun scripts
Next by thread: Processing of bibtex2html_1.89-1_amd64.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread