Re: ocaml_3.10.0-10_i386.changes ACCEPTED
On 19-12-2007, Ralf Treinen <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:48:03PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>> On 19-12-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:02:04AM +0000, Debian Installer wrote:
>> >> Accepted:
>> > This was annoying.
>> > I've (thought I had) fixed the bug, since I did svn-buildpackage and
>> > then checked that the script was executable in the resulting .deb. It
>> > was since the build was made starting from an "svn export" which
>> > preservers the executable bit.
>> > Then I've rebuild the official package for the upload using cowbuilder,
>> > assuming everything was fine. It was not, since cowbuilder starts from
>> > the .dsc + .diff.gz which do not preserve the executable bit.
>> > That's why I'm going from a second upload, with now an explicit chmod +x
>> > inside debian/control.
>> > /me hates the tiny teeny differences among
>> > our build tools and now wonders why the hell
>> > svn-buildpackage starts from a svn export if
>> > that can cause unexpected build differences.
>> /me Understanding Zack which has been hit by the same bug as the first I
>> fell into
>> Maybe we can fill a bug concerning this problem against
> yes, I think that merits a bug against svn-buildpackage.
Sylvain Le Gall