Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:24:05AM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:Romain's recent ITP and the "discussion" on caml-list about this topic lead me to ask whether ocaml_packaging_policy should take a stand and recommend one spelling over the other in package descriptions etc. I have a slight preference for OCaml, but a greater preference for consistency.Uhm ... I've no strong feeling about whether we should take a stand on this or not, but my preferences are with you: OCaml.
Same here, I've used OCaml everywhere in my package descriptions... ++ Sam.