On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:24:05AM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
> Romain's recent ITP and the "discussion" on caml-list about this topic
> lead me to ask whether ocaml_packaging_policy should take a stand and
> recommend one spelling over the other in package descriptions etc. I
> have a slight preference for OCaml, but a greater preference for
> consistency.
Uhm ... I've no strong feeling about whether we should take a stand on
this or not, but my preferences are with you: OCaml.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature