On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 06:21:06PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Sure. I forget to mention that Julien and me came to the conclusion that
> having only a Suggests: on the ocaml part for this libgraphvizN-dev
> package would be acceptable, since its primary goal is to build C stuff
> against graphviz, and a secondary goal is to provide the OCaml
> development files. Putting a sentence about that in the long description
> would probably dissipate any doubt in users' mind.
Ah, ok, now I've more information on this :) I'm not entirely
enthusiastic about this solution, but is definitely better than not
having ocaml bindings for graphviz in debian. So go for it.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature