Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> (21/10/2007): > Looking at the package the main advice that IMO needs to be > implemented is still to split libgraphviz-ocaml and > libgraphviz-ocaml-dev That's becoming a bit too much of a hassle for just bindings packages, I'm actually thinking of dropping the OCaml part. A binary per language is OK, having -dev for bindings packages too is becoming just too much. The initial proposition [1] of putting -dev things in libgraphvizN-dev sounded acceptable to me, though (Julien seconded it on IRC). 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2007/09/msg00170.html > (Cyril: see the thread on debian-ocaml-maint for details on what > should be put in one and what in the other, I'm not sure you're > following our mailing list and I forgot to Cc you in previous posts). Indeed, I'm not subscribed, that's why I set Reply-To in the first mail. > In addition to that, you will also need to install ocaml stuff under > /usr/lib/ocaml/VERSION/graphviz/ rather then under > /usr/lib/graphviz/ocaml/ which is what I still see in the git version > of the package. In the previous mail, I detailed the content of the package, available online at [2]. It looks like I also pointed to the debian/rules diff in that mail, which shows the (a priori) correct use of $(OCAMLABI). 2. http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2007/10/msg00095.html Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature