On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:11:07AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: > > Finally, if you use a directory structure in which the directory for > > upstream stuff is called "tarballs" rather than "upstream" you diminish > > the degree of customization needed for svn-buildpackage. > > We should maybe change this in our policy? Well, yep, why not. But I don't see the need to change all the directories in our repository, it's just I find more handy to use "tarballs" for new packages just because it requires less svn-buildpackage tweaking ... But yes, suggesting the proper structure in the future is of course a good idea. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature