On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:11:07AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> > Finally, if you use a directory structure in which the directory for
> > upstream stuff is called "tarballs" rather than "upstream" you diminish
> > the degree of customization needed for svn-buildpackage.
>
> We should maybe change this in our policy?
Well, yep, why not. But I don't see the need to change all the
directories in our repository, it's just I find more handy to use
"tarballs" for new packages just because it requires less
svn-buildpackage tweaking ... But yes, suggesting the proper structure
in the future is of course a good idea.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature