[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#416872: marked as done (Description incorrectly talks about emacs support.)



Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:32:02 +0000
with message-id <E1IXaN8-0005By-IZ@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#416872: fixed in meta-ocaml 3.10.0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: ocaml-core
Version: 3.09.2.0
Severity: wishlist

  ocaml-core's description says it depends on the emacs support package,
but I'm pretty sure it's referring to ocaml-mode, which it doesn't
declare any dependency on.

  Feel free to slap me around if I misunderstood. :)

  Daniel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: meta-ocaml
Source-Version: 3.10.0.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
meta-ocaml, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

meta-ocaml_3.10.0.1.dsc
  to pool/main/m/meta-ocaml/meta-ocaml_3.10.0.1.dsc
meta-ocaml_3.10.0.1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/meta-ocaml/meta-ocaml_3.10.0.1.tar.gz
ocaml-core_3.10.0.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/meta-ocaml/ocaml-core_3.10.0.1_all.deb
ocaml-libs_3.10.0.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/meta-ocaml/ocaml-libs_3.10.0.1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 416872@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> (supplier of updated meta-ocaml package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:23:10 +0200
Source: meta-ocaml
Binary: ocaml-libs ocaml-core
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.10.0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
Description: 
 ocaml-core - OCaml core tools (metapackage)
 ocaml-libs - OCaml core Libraries (metapackage)
Closes: 416872
Changes: 
 meta-ocaml (3.10.0.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [Julien Cristau]
   * Remove inactive people from the Uploaders field.
 .
   [Ralf Treinen]
   * Added dependency on cmigrep and ocamlmakefile
   * Minor modification to long description (closes: #416872)
 .
   [Stefano Zacchiroli]
   * bump debhelper dep and compatibility level to 5
   * debian/control
     - remove dep on netclient (now shipped by ocamlnet)
     - remove dep on ocamldbi (not very user/active)
     - add dep on camlp4 and camlp4-extra (now shipped separately)
Files: 
 77e464e60c5ecf373899253800581c84 828 devel optional meta-ocaml_3.10.0.1.dsc
 6db6f09e559a358f8bf469ad23b8814e 3884 devel optional meta-ocaml_3.10.0.1.tar.gz
 04ff66cd29e3b7d67a399e317adaac03 4158 devel optional ocaml-core_3.10.0.1_all.deb
 7740f40699b81265cf21cc32d6c8aa13 4032 devel optional ocaml-libs_3.10.0.1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG76fT1cqbBPLEI7wRApDIAJ9NLdDHMwZElIU6D8yi3zlHkYIiBACfdWnO
JkH/huYEGJiZssGOyuNOcOw=
=PwLD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: