Re: what should we do about confluence?
On 03-09-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> I guess that is what I am going to do, and put debian-ocaml-maint as
>> maintainer. Any other opinions on that?
>
> Personally, I would ask for its removal from the archive. I don't like
> to have to take over the burden of a package just because it is written
> in OCaml whereas noone of use cares about it. I'm fine with Sylvain's
> reasoning, but then we should even stop rebuilding it (just binNMU
> maybe) as soon as it won't build anymore we drop it.
>
> The right path for confluence's user would be to file a RFP to package
> atom and find an interested Haskell maintainer. (Maybe we can contact
> the Debian Haskell maintainers asking them pro-actively to package it?)
>
> Of course if you are interested in rebuilding it just go ahead :)
>
Well, in fact, i also consider directly dropping from archive, BUT:
* popcon of 60 is in fact a good score for ocaml package (i check, there
is package that are really lower than that)
* upload to the archive is quite recent
* it seems to continue building with OCaml 3.10.0
I think we should adopt it, in the name of d-o-m and fill a RFH.
Regards,
Sylvain Le Gall
Reply to: