Re: browsing ocamldoc generated documentation
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:35:31PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> Go ahead. (even if i don't find the CGI solution a good one, at least,
> it exists).
Agreed. I see two drawbacks:
- Not all our docs are for APIs -- it would be nice to include all the ocaml
tool documentation also
- I don't run one a local web server on my workstation, which this
requires.
But it won't break anything, so I won't object strongly.
Also, I don't see the need for the verbose names. What's wrong
with the current <PACKAGENAME> entry in /usr/share/doc-base?
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
Reply to: