On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:52:18PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> Have Debian considered packaging a curses/ncurses binding?
I did in the past, but gave up due to the lack of a "reliable" upstream.
I was aware of ocaml-tmk you are mentioning (which seems to be quite
dead ...) and of the curses example used in the OCaml manual for showing
how to use the C/OCaml glue code.
> I intend to fork this project to create a stable upstream which both
> Debian and Fedora can use, unless you know of another binding which I
> should be using instead.
Why forking? Have you tried contacting the author and asking him to
become a member of the Savannah project? Seems to be a better start to
me.
Notwithstanding that I totally welcome a reliable upstream for such a
library. Debianers: any taker for the Debian package? I'm quite settled
with mine ATM :)
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature