On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:52:18PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > Have Debian considered packaging a curses/ncurses binding? I did in the past, but gave up due to the lack of a "reliable" upstream. I was aware of ocaml-tmk you are mentioning (which seems to be quite dead ...) and of the curses example used in the OCaml manual for showing how to use the C/OCaml glue code. > I intend to fork this project to create a stable upstream which both > Debian and Fedora can use, unless you know of another binding which I > should be using instead. Why forking? Have you tried contacting the author and asking him to become a member of the Savannah project? Seems to be a better start to me. Notwithstanding that I totally welcome a reliable upstream for such a library. Debianers: any taker for the Debian package? I'm quite settled with mine ATM :) Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature