On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:48:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> The commits are still send to the list, so we would just need to add a
> tag in fron of the topic. maybe [NMU] or something.
Ok for the tag, but notice that commits are sent to a separate list. I'm
also proposing to send [NMU] commits to the discussion list, in the same
spirit of the NMU notifications which get delivered to Maintainers of
NMU-ed packages.
> I don't know how ACL work, but maybe it is easily to distiguish
> between team members and outsiders with it, no ?
It's nothing special: users can write to a file as if the had write
permissions. So we will see the user name of the commiter and we would
just need to compare it with the *nix group matching our project.
> Furthermore, i don't remember what the current concesnsus is, but would
> this not be the time to split the mailing list between d-o and d-o-m ?
> With the bug reports and svn commits going to d-o-m, and general
> discussion like this one staying on d-o (and a possible future d-i-devel
> splitoff if we ever need a pure user list).
It's already as this. Discussion d-o-m, commits to
pkg-ocaml-commits@l.a.d.o or similar. The fact the mailing list is
called d-o-m is now not really standard wrt to other lists, but I don't
see the point of changing it at this point in our history.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature