Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention -- Felix
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 16:16 -0600, DDPOMail robot wrote:
> Dear John Skaller,
> The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
> you maintain in Debian:
>
> === felix: (you co-maintain this package)
> = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable
> to testing for more than 305 days.
> A more detailed status of your packages is available from the DDPO.
> See:
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=skaller@users.sf.net
Mike Furr is the other (and real!) maintainer and uploader/DD.
A bit confused here: how can Felix 1.1.3 have been in
testing for 305 days .. ? Since it was only just uploaded .. :)
#430234 -- long double upgrade thing. Ouch. Does the status
apply to the source package or just binaries for a particular
platform?
#339061 -- ia64 build broken -- yes we know, it's a bug
in Ocaml on ia64 .. still broken with 3.10?
#339164 -- yes, this is a real bug for 1.1.1, but the install
model changed with 1.1.3, so Felix no longer ships anything
directly in /usr/include or /usr/lib.
This bug has a 2005 date on it .. why is it still there?
#424252 -- felix: FTBFS if built twice in a row
Looks like a packaging issue..
#383942 -- felix: newer upstream release
Yeah .. 1.1.2 ... old, should be closed now
BTW: why doesn't the Felix mailing list felix-impl@lists.sourceforge.net
get mail about the package status? Mike, is that a listed maintainer
address?
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net
Reply to: