Re: native code incompatibilities vs byte code incompatibilities
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:02:31AM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> OK, I see the point now. I had assumed -- wrongly -- that the hash of
> a.cmo would change in this case, but it does not. So we need a
> version of ocamlobjinfo which can handle *.cmx files as well.
Right, that's our issue to. Maybe now we are two different large
distribution we have more power to go and ask INRIA for this?
Julien: can you refresh our memory about the tool (IIRC) you spotted in
the OCaml sources able to extract info from *.cmx files?
> There is another problem with ocamlobjinfo too. See:
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/fa.caml/msg/f2c3e9e8cfa628b3?hl=en&;
>
> In Fedora we have avoided this by having a list of modules in the
> standard library which we just ignore (Asttypes, Outcometree and
> Cmo_format so far).
Ok, maybe we can keep it on a shared wiki page to ease of maintenance?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Reply to: