Hi Stefano, thanks for your work on ocaml 3.10.0! On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 19:50:37 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Open issues (i.e. request for comments from other debian camlers): > > - the ocaml-source package now contains ocaml sources *after* debian > specific patches have been applied. Is that what we want? (My answer > is yes, but one can argue that a vanilla source tarball is desirable) I agree with you that shipping sources corresponding to the ocaml binaries we build is better. > - ocamlbuild is installed upstream as ocamlbuild.byte / > ocamlbuild.native / ocamlbuild (the latter being a *copy* of the best > executable among the former two). This breaks the convention of foo / > foo.opt of other legacy ocaml tools. I thus renamed ocamlbuild so that > the plain version is bytecode (and is in ocaml-nox) and so that > ocamlbuild.opt is the optimized version (and is in > ocaml-native-compilers). Do you like my choice? Yes :) > > - assuming the experimental packages are fine (please test them no > matter the open issues above!) are we ready to upload to unstable? (Of > course pending an approval of the RMs) > re: coq/camlp4, I'd rather not upload another ocaml-3.09 package unless we think it'll take more than say a month for coq to be ready. Worst case, coq will get removed from testing for a few weeks to let the ocaml transition through, and I don't think it's a very big issue. Cheers, and see you on Saturday, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature