Re: About CDuce and OCamlduce
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:32:38AM +0200, Alain Frisch wrote:
> I found some recent discussions in this mailing list (which I'm not
> subscribed to, so please Cc: me if you want to reply to this e-mail)
> about CDuce and OCamlduce. Some clarifying points:
Hi Alain, thanks for getting in touch with us for this.
> - cduce needs the ocaml sources, ocaml-compiler-libs is not enough; the
> reason is that cduce will -pack OCaml compiler modules, which requires
> some special compilation command-line (-for-pack) for native code.
Ok, fair enough, we will re-enable the generation of the ocaml-source
package then. While we are at it (and since I'm lazy to check it right
now :)), does CDuce need a fresh untarred tarball of the OCaml sources
or any other particular stage of the OCaml sources (e.g. after building
the compiler)?
> - ocamlduce is a stand-alone package, which requires only a working
> OCaml installation. It is distributed as a modified version of OCaml,
> *not* as a patch. ocamlduce hasn't been ported to 3.10, though.
Ok.
> - I've clarified the licensing issues about ocamlduce: the license is
> the same as for OCaml (QPL/LGPL + exceptions). Cf:
> http://sympa.cduce.org/wws/arc/ocamlduce/2007-04/msg00007.html
Ok, thanks, great!
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Reply to: