Re: removal of the ocaml-source binary package
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:04:20AM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> On 15-04-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 07:33:07PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> >> I have just checked into svn my modifications. The package compiles now
> >> (at least on i386), but I havent tested anything yet.
> > Beside that, which I plan to investigate, more work would be needed to
> > write the file list to be used while creating the ocaml-source pacakge.
> > But I'm wondering whether we should ship it or not. AFAIK it's no longer
> > needed since we deployed the ocaml-compiler-libs package and since wlex
> > (which needed the ocaml sources to be patched at compile time) was
> > removed from the archive.
> > Anyone else is using that package? Otherwise I'll be more than happy to
> > remove its building from the ocaml source package.
> Cameleon package build-depends on it, a long time ago. I think it is no
> more needed (since ocaml-compiler-libs should do almost what is
> needed... but i am working on getting a more up-to-date list of library
cduce still build-depends on ocaml-source:
% apt-cache showsrc cduce
Maintainer: Thomas Petazzoni <email@example.com>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), ocaml-nox (>= 3.09.2), ocaml-source (>= 3.09.2), libpcre-ocaml-dev (>= 5.11.1), libocamlnet-ocaml-dev (>= 1.1), libexpat-ocaml-dev (>= 0.9.1), libcurl-ocaml-dev (>= 0.2.1), ocaml-ulex, dpatch, chrpath, bzip2