Re: After the release: ocaml 3.09.3 or 3.10.0 ?
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 07:35:57AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 10:41:25PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > Hello,
> > On 31-03-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:36:56PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > >> Well, i am just asking myself if we will really release 3.09.3 since
> > >> 3.10.0 seems to come soon ?
> > >
> > > Given the subject I guess you were meaning not "release" but rather what
> > > to "package" after the release. Of course 3.10.0!
> > >
> > Maybe, i don't understand the difference, but we have "almost" package
> > 3.09.3, since it is standing in experimental according to
> > http://packages.debian.org/experimental/devel/ocaml
> > (this is 3.09.3 rc1 but AFAIK there is not a big difference with 3.09.3)
> > So since, we have package it, i was asking if we will upload this
> > package to unstable ("upload a package" is maybe more clear than release
> > a package version).
> > But, i agree with you, that we should jump to 3.10.0.
> What is the status of ocaml with regard to the etch release ? Everything is in
> testing, and etch is frozen anyway, so we could start uploading 3.09.3 to sid
> asap, and use t-p-u in case a bugfix is needed for etch ?
AFAIK the freeze upload policy, which is still effective, states that
only packages that are intended to go into etch should be uploaded to
sid, eveything else should go to testing. Or did I miss something?