[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: After the release: ocaml 3.09.3 or 3.10.0 ?



On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 10:41:25PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 31-03-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:36:56PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> >> Well, i am just asking myself if we will really release 3.09.3 since
> >> 3.10.0 seems to come soon ?
> >
> > Given the subject I guess you were meaning not "release" but rather what
> > to "package" after the release. Of course 3.10.0!
> >
> 
> Maybe, i don't understand the difference, but we have "almost" package
> 3.09.3, since it is standing in experimental according to 
> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/devel/ocaml
> (this is 3.09.3 rc1 but AFAIK there is not a big difference with 3.09.3)
> 
> So since, we have package it, i was asking if we will upload this
> package to unstable ("upload a package" is maybe more clear than release
> a package version). 
> 
> But, i agree with you, that we should jump to 3.10.0.

What is the status of ocaml with regard to the etch release ? Everything is in
testing, and etch is frozen anyway, so we could start uploading 3.09.3 to sid
asap, and use t-p-u in case a bugfix is needed for etch ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: