[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Missing build-dependency in ocaml-gettext



Hello,

On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 12:04:38AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> ocaml-gettext depends on camlidl for its compilation, but this package
> is not listed inside the Build-Depends. The attached patch fixes it.
> 
> I have an out-of-topic question, but not so out-of-topic because
> ocaml-gettext builds-depends on fop. Why is fop in contrib ? I am
> successfully using it using gij, a GNU Java bytecode interpreter (which
> is free, of course). Are there other non-free dependencies in fop ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas
> -- 
> PETAZZONI Thomas - thomas.petazzoni@enix.org 
> http://{thomas,sos,kos}.enix.org - Jabber: thomas.petazzoni@jabber.dk
> http://{agenda,livret}dulibre.org - http://www.toulibre.org
> Fingerprint : 0BE1 4CF3 CEA4 AC9D CC6E  1624 F653 CB30 98D3 F7A7

> Index: debian/control
> ===================================================================
> --- debian/control	(r??vision 3187)
> +++ debian/control	(copie de travail)
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  Section: libdevel
>  Priority: optional
>  Maintainer: Sylvain Le Gall <gildor@debian.org>
> -Build-Depends: ocaml-nox (>= 3.09.2), debhelper (>> 4.0.0), ocaml-findlib, dpatch, libcamomile-ocaml-dev, libast-analyze-ocaml-dev, libfileutils-ocaml-dev, xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, fop, chrpath, dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.19)
> +Build-Depends: ocaml-nox (>= 3.09.2), debhelper (>> 4.0.0), ocaml-findlib, dpatch, libcamomile-ocaml-dev, libast-analyze-ocaml-dev, libfileutils-ocaml-dev, xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, fop, chrpath, dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.19), camlidl
>  Standards-Version: 3.7.2
>  XS-X-Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-ocaml-maint/trunk/packages/ocaml-gettext
>  

Thanks for the patch, but you know : ocaml-gettext has not been
uploaded !

Concerning the dependency on fop : i have a way to avoid it, in order to
make ocaml-gettext directly go to main (and not contrib).

Anyway, thanks for the patch, i apply it right now.

Regard
Sylvain Le Gall



Reply to: