[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#383527: marked as done (mldonkey: [m68k] FTBFS: unrecognized command line option "-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer")

Your message dated Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:47:28 -0700
with message-id <E1GE00m-0004cP-9u@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#383527: fixed in mldonkey 2.7.7-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: mldonkey
Version: 2.7.7-8
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

Automatic build of mldonkey_2.7.7-8 on garkin by sbuild/m68k 85
[...]
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.6-19 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.8-1 gcc-4.1_4.1.1-11 g++-4.1_4.1.1-11 binutils_2.17-2+b1 libstdc++6-4.1-dev_4.1.1-11 libstdc++6_4.1.1-11
[...]
m68k-linux-gnu-g++  -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -o src/utils/lib/CryptoPP.o "-I/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.2" -c src/utils/lib/CryptoPP.cc
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer"
make[1]: *** [src/utils/lib/CryptoPP.o] Error 1


Full logs are available at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=mldonkey&ver=

Christian

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: mldonkey
Source-Version: 2.7.7-9

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mldonkey, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mldonkey-gui_2.7.7-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey-gui_2.7.7-9_i386.deb
mldonkey-server_2.7.7-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey-server_2.7.7-9_i386.deb
mldonkey_2.7.7-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey_2.7.7-9.diff.gz
mldonkey_2.7.7-9.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey_2.7.7-9.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 383527@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org> (supplier of updated mldonkey package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:09:00 +0000
Source: mldonkey
Binary: mldonkey-gui mldonkey-server
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.7.7-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org>
Description: 
 mldonkey-gui - Graphical frontend for mldonkey based on GTK
 mldonkey-server - Door to the 'donkey' network
Closes: 380222 383527
Changes: 
 mldonkey (2.7.7-9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added cryptoflags.dpatch to use the -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer option
     only where available, closes: #383527.
   * Not installing mldonkey_create_chroot anymore for now, closes: #380222.
   * Correctly use --build and --host in configure.
Files: 
 ed361ed460255dba00481b8f602d9afb 996 net optional mldonkey_2.7.7-9.dsc
 4218d43454c15e58f374ab8bb765b4c6 312668 net optional mldonkey_2.7.7-9.diff.gz
 cdb0c1507fba9949bca06335c9940f27 2869516 net optional mldonkey-server_2.7.7-9_i386.deb
 a29b4584b48adb1494db6c4e34472071 3261388 net optional mldonkey-gui_2.7.7-9_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE5Xt5Iae1O4AJae8RAo+lAJ9h5PzPomLyR/nAZDQm5ztC8XeI8QCeILQd
kDrLvVTvcktcQ7DyaUV4wWw=
=57Rl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: