Re: binNMU requests for the ocaml transition
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:12:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 11:20:22AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:43:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:05:48AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > > any dependencies other than ocaml-nox-3.09.1, ocaml-base-3.09.1, and
> > > ocaml-base-nox-3.09.1 that necessitate rebuilds?
>
> > Since the ocaml package depend upon themselves, if you start from
> > ocaml-base-nox-3.09.1, you should get all the tree of dependent packages from this
> > one.
>
> That's not particularly helpful; I need to know the list of direct
> dependencies that require binNMUs.
My stand on this is binNMUs all oif them, and then hand-fix all those which
FTBFS. But i have not followed this transition, so i can't really help you
there.
Maybe you could just kick all traces of 3.09.1 from the archive, and then
binNMU all those who are depending on them or something ? That should do it,
and you are maybe better armed than us to know about this.
The 3.09.2 upgrade is a bug fix upgrade, so altough ABI may be broken in some
case, there should be no major API changes, and thus all packages could have
been binNMUed.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: