[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: build-depending on a virtual package



On Saturday 06 May 2006 21:03, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 08:47:57PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > Another build problem is that ara source package produces four binary
> > packages, but two of them (ara and xara-gtk) are not supposed to be built
> > on some arches (like m68k, mips...) since they lack the native code
> > compiler.
> >
> > We can make autobuilders happy anyway, but we can not prevent users of
> > these arches (m68k, mips...) to build the source package locally (see
> > #290338, 336283) and see the failure.
> >
> > Presently we show them a message explaining the reasons, but seems it is
> > not enough explanative for some users ;-). Also dpkg-genchanges and
> > friends are not quite happy when only two of the declared binary packages
> > are being completed. Is there any sane way to convince these tools that
> > "we know what we are doing" [tm] and to shut them up ?
> >
> > I have a really ugly hack for rules which is able complete all binary
> > packages declared even on these arches lacking native code compilers. See
> > rules.hack at: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ara/trunk/debian/?rev=0&sc=0
> > (yes, that is ugly, but doable I think ;-)

I'll remove that hack since it is rather uncivilized !

> It seems to me, that your debian/control is badly set. Please have a look

Oh, sorry Sven, the noise was bogus (seems my memory is out of memory 
lately ;-) 

Everything is fine after 1.0.10 ! E.g. if I simulate a non-native arch (like 
mips, m64k) by moving away my ocamlopt and ocamlopt.opt executables then just 
-byte binary packages are being produced, otherwise (e.g. on native arches) 
we produce them all. This is what we need for autobuilders and 
end-user-builders to be happy. I think I can close these bugs soon via 
NNN-done@...

> at what we did with some other packages, where we use s substvar to set the
> architectures that need native builds. If i remember well, spamoracle is an
> example which does what you want to do.

Spamoracle is where you pointed by at the very first place to look at and ara 
follows spamoracle ideology almost on a step by step basis. Thanks.

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB 



Reply to: