On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 01:19:28AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote: > > * Package name : libannexlib-ocaml > > Please X-Debbugs-Cc debian-ocaml-maint for ITP related to OCaml. Sorry about that. > That said, I think the package name should reflect upstream's being > "annexlib". The binary name can be those you proporse. Right -- I misunderstood the term "package name" in that context. My intention is as you suggest -- the package name is "annexlib", producing two binary packages, "libannexlib-ocaml" and "libannexlib-ocaml-dev". Do I need to do anything to the ITP to reflect this, or should I just close it any start again? Ewan.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature