Re: [Caml-list] Release 3.09.1
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:28:27PM -0500, Mike Furr wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Stefano wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:09:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yes. The problem with your approach is that it works if everything is
> > did that way. What happens when a maintainer wants to upload a library
> > which depend on another one which have been binNMUed? He will need to
> > specify a dependency against a specific binNMU, is it possible? AFAIK
> > binNMU does not bump versions. Am I wrong?
> It does bump the version with a '+b1'. See:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/11/msg01368.html
> for the new style of version changes which supersedes what is currently
> written in the debian-reference.
Well, only for the real depends, the only one which stays is the
build-dependency, the dependencies are indeed handled correctly and
automatically, and packages built with the wrong version of ocaml will be
uninstallable together with ocaml.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: