Re: [Caml-list] Release 3.09.1
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:39:45PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:09:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Why ? I mean, if it worked well, why would you want to reupload it ? Just so
> > you dump the >= 3.09.0 dep ?
>
> Yes. The problem with your approach is that it works if everything is
> did that way. What happens when a maintainer wants to upload a library
> which depend on another one which have been binNMUed? He will need to
> specify a dependency against a specific binNMU, is it possible? AFAIK
> binNMU does not bump versions. Am I wrong?
I am not saying it is perfect, my idea was to do it such now, to test out and
discover what the problematic points are, and refine the process next time.
Still, there is indeed a problem with people uploading with a locally build
ocaml 3.09.0 when the rest of the archive is 3.09.1 already.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: