Re: [Caml-list] Release 3.09.1
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:55:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:45:03PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:19:01PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:19:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> > > > > Unless someone objects to it, I'll package and upload OCaml 3.09.1 as
> > > > > soon as 3.09.0 is in testing. Do you all agree with a full rebuild?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, but let's do it like this :
> > > >
> > > > 1) we wait until ocaml 3.09.1 is built and installed on all autobuilders.
> > > >
> > > > 2) we compose a list of all ocaml related packages.
> > > >
> > > > 3) we ask Steve to requeue all those ocaml related packages for a binNMU,
> > > > and file RC bugs against all those that fail.
> > >
> > > But we still have to do a source upload for those packages which Depend
> > > on ocaml-*-3.09.0, I guess. I'm thinking of packages that are
> > > architecture=all, and compiled to byte-code.
> >
> > The packages in the SVN repository that have rules to generate
> > debian/control based on the OCaml API version will need to have a
> > newly-generated debian/control committed first, and then uploaded, right?
> > So it's not just a binNMU, unless I'm missing something.
>
> Well, only the build-depend was generated, the rest is provided by
> dh_gencontrol, and as we used (ocaml >= 3.09.0) for build dependencies, this
> should work without problem, provided we guarantee that there is no older
> ocaml 3.09.0 on the autobuilders.
Did I miss something? Since when does dh_gencontrol detect the
dependency of ocaml-bytecode on the right version of the ocaml
interpreter?
-Ralf.
Reply to: