[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#341203: marked as done (tuareg-mode: function line-number definition is void)



Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:02:07 -0800
with message-id <E1Eregh-0001iF-6O@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#341203: fixed in tuareg-mode 1.45.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 07:28:56 +0000
>From yang.shx@fltrp.com Mon Nov 28 23:28:56 2005
Return-path: <yang.shx@fltrp.com>
Received: from [218.247.244.2] (helo=mail.fltrp.com)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Egzv3-0001J4-3D
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:28:56 -0800
Received: from yangsx.fltrp.com [192.168.15.11] by mail.fltrp.com with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.15) id A3A8F20094; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:30:48 +0800
From: YANG Shouxun <yang.shx@fltrp.com>
Organization: FLTRP
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tuareg-mode: function line-number definition is void
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:31:51 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200511291531.51725.yang.shx@fltrp.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tuareg-mode
Version: 1.45.0-beta3-1
Severity: normal

I found definitions scan in tuareg-mode sometimes failed for some time now. In 
tuareg.el, lines 3296-8:

      (if scan-error
	  (message "Parse error when scanning definitions: line %s!"
		   (line-number))

but the function 'line-number' cannot be found in a normal emacs installation, 
including both Emacs 21.4a and Emacs snapshot available in Debian sid. I've 
already have elib, emacs-goodies-el and cedet-common installed.

Scanning 'gdome.mli' if 'libgdome2-ocaml-dev' is installed will reproduce the 
bug.

Best,

shouxun


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341203-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2005 17:10:52 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Wed Dec 28 09:10:52 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Eregh-0001iF-6O; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:02:07 -0800
From: Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org>
To: 341203-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#341203: fixed in tuareg-mode 1.45.2-1
Message-Id: <E1Eregh-0001iF-6O@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:02:07 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: tuareg-mode
Source-Version: 1.45.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tuareg-mode, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tuareg-mode_1.45.2-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tuareg-mode/tuareg-mode_1.45.2-1.diff.gz
tuareg-mode_1.45.2-1.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tuareg-mode/tuareg-mode_1.45.2-1.dsc
tuareg-mode_1.45.2-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tuareg-mode/tuareg-mode_1.45.2-1_all.deb
tuareg-mode_1.45.2.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/tuareg-mode/tuareg-mode_1.45.2.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 341203@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org> (supplier of updated tuareg-mode package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:46:08 +0100
Source: tuareg-mode
Binary: tuareg-mode
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.45.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org>
Description: 
 tuareg-mode - An emacs-mode for ocaml programs
Closes: 341203
Changes: 
 tuareg-mode (1.45.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release. This release incorporates our patch
     to work around the missing line-number function
     in emacs (closes: #341203).
   * Install an emacs startup file with priority 51, and replace the installed
     append-tuareg.el file by an empty file. Adapt README.Debian accordingly,
     make a note in NEWS.
   * Some improvements in long package description.
   * Patch 03_autoload_pattern: Narrow autoload-pattern down to what is really
     needed for OCaml files.
   * New uploader Sylvain Le Gall.
Files: 
 3e92cd6a62baa5babc2e47276f54d83d 879 devel optional tuareg-mode_1.45.2-1.dsc
 99a53b7b8d4aa6f92a40af79ec32e075 53139 devel optional tuareg-mode_1.45.2.orig.tar.gz
 10a69f6411f5ca993aa8251f7d03732e 6318 devel optional tuareg-mode_1.45.2-1.diff.gz
 88bd70d283e05d3ce0620c46c54a987e 55816 devel optional tuareg-mode_1.45.2-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDssEttzWmSeC6BMERAgtZAJ0cuBRLTMsen1caHmHhWpA9LhCaYACfa6z+
RxzfKimPMtUCrYGw57dSZ/k=
=wGVY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: