Re: numerix maintenance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 07:59:59AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>What shall we do about numerix? There are two FTBFS bugs, one of them
>>>with a patch (thanks to Michel), and a HPPA-specific failure that
>>>might be fixed by a simple rebuild.
I've done the last few uploads of numerix, but certainly don't mind if
someone else goes ahead and uploads it (that's why maintainer is set to
the group).
Also, I wanted to thank you Florian for all of the work you've done on
this bug lately, it certainly would have taken me a while to track down
those assembly problems!
Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'm currently working on updating the package in svn.
> I think it's basically ready, so if someone more familiar with numerix
> than I am could test it and upload if appropriate, this could fix bugs
> #338233 and #335881. I've got no idea about #332902.
I still haven't gotten around to looking at svn-buildpackage (really
need to do this methinks), so I don't know how to build the package
after the changes you've made. But I'm sure your changes are fine.
I'm not sure about 332902. It certainly appears to be an easy fix, but
personally, I'm getting tired of having to enable --broken-arch-option
on more and more of my packages. I'd be tempted to reassign it to gcc
and force it to accept the same code as every other arch.
Cheers,
- -Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDlxXe7ZPKKRJLJvMRAlcxAJ9csAVZ3KHrOVv+lRewosaKXNXy4ACdFBZn
WJPA4jjE41QvhMhtyATq4IY=
=KroG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: