Re: ocaml 3.09.0 and word from the RMs ...
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:47:04PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:13:21PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, i was wrong, obviously, there is only one, altough it is of two
> > different kinds.
>
> Ok.
>
> > If we move debian/control to debian/control.in, we can then use the same
> > substitution for a debian/control target in the rules file. Let me adapt
> > lablgl to this scheme and so you can compare.
>
> I prefere the solution without debian/control.in, is a complication
> which does not add much benefit IMO.
Well, it is pretty standard, and i hope that dpkg-buildpackage will soon learn
how to generate it automatically.
> > I hear that there is discussin for moving the libraries to the abi
> > scheme also, which would be reather neat.
>
> I don't know what you heard, but Julien contacted me about dh_ocaml and
> a proposal for having more fine grained library dependencies and we
> discussed a way of automatic computation of ABI numbers from md5sums. He
> is preparing a draft proposal which will be posted soon on d-o-m for
> comments. In that proposal your idea of substitution can probably be
> integrated from depending libraries. More on this soon.
Yeah, that was it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: