Re: Bug#336283: ara: [m68k] FTBFS
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:10:12AM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> On Saturday 29 October 2005 10:06, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Package: ara
> > Version: 1.0.10
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Automatic build of ara_1.0.10 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 69
> > [...]
> > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev,
> > ocaml-best-compilers, m4 [...]
> > touch build-indep-stamp
> > touch build-stamp
> > /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
> > touch build-stamp
> > dh_testdir
> > dh_testroot
> > dh_clean -k
> > dh_installdirs
> > mkdir -p /build/buildd/ara-1.0.10/debian/tmp
> > if [ -x /usr/bin/ocamlopt -o -x /usr/bin/ocamlopt.opt ]; then \
> > /usr/bin/make install DESTDIR=/build/buildd/ara-1.0.10/debian/tmp ; \
> > fi
> > # The arch-dependent packages are only available on archs supported by
> > ocamlopt There are no native code compilers on arch m68k so this package
> > arch-dependant part should not build on it. dpkg-genchanges -B
> > -mDebian/m68k Build Daemon <cts-aahz@debian.org> dpkg-genchanges:
> > arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent packages
> > dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or
> > directory
>
> Well, we end up needing dpkg-genchanges and dpkg-buildpackage with support for
> building only architecture-independant parts of the package and not
> architecture-dependent ones (see #109794 #200454).
There is already infrastructure for binary-arch and binary-indep available, as
well as two set of build-deps, the normal ones and the indep ones.
> > If this package is not supposed to be built on m68k, please say so in your
> > control file and/or stop the build right at the beginning.
Christian, this is a fuckup of the buildd's i think, which try to build stuff
even if not marked for them. Not sure i haven't locked at this recently.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: