Re: ocaml 3.09.0 and word from the RMs ...
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 02:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I spoke with Steve Langasek, and it seems that apart from the following two
> issues, we are go.
>
> 1) We should not in any case upload lablgtk or any of its reverse dependencies,
> before the libpng/imlib transition. I think this is a non-issue, because
> we plan to kind of get rideof lablgtk1 foretch, right ?
>
> 2) other uploads, like ocurl, and maybe approx, cduce, or geneweb, which
> happened recently and are not yet in testing. These we have the choice to
> wait or have them go in with the ocaml 3.09.0 stuff.
>
> So, it would be nice if all of you checked your packages, and saw if there is
> a problem and added it here, and for the approx, cduce, occurl, geneweb, ...
> maintainers to come forward and decide whether it should go in (and possibly
> be fast-tracked), or if we go with 3.09.0 for them.
>
> The other decision is what to do about lablgtk1 and cameleon i think it was.
> It seems there is a lablgtk2 version of cameleon, which altough beta, should
> be packaged, not sure about the other lablgtk1 packages, but i think it is a
> good time to try to get ride of both lablgtk1 and mlgtk.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wanadoo vous informe que cet e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail.
> Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
>
>
>
Reply to: