On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:16:47AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > I vote for ocaml-mode (even if I believe that's a bit a namespace abuse
> Let's go for ocaml-mode
Ok, just be sure to specify in package description that the shipped
emacs mode is ok also for caml, and maybe even the "caml-mode" name of
the emacs mode so that apt-cache search will work as expected.
> > Why it depends on ocaml-nox?
> Because it needs development binaries like ocamlc.
Ok, would recommend as suggested by Ralf be enough? I guess that some
features of the emacs mode like, e.g. indentation, would not need ocamlc
to be useful.
> > As Sven I'm against the transitional purpose argument. I would go for no
> > relationship at all (no Depends/Recommends/Suggests) from ocaml-nox to
> Why would Suggests be a problem? I'd like to suggest tuareg-mode |
> ocaml-mode.
You're right, indeed it would not be a problem, go for it.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature