On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:16:47AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > I vote for ocaml-mode (even if I believe that's a bit a namespace abuse > Let's go for ocaml-mode Ok, just be sure to specify in package description that the shipped emacs mode is ok also for caml, and maybe even the "caml-mode" name of the emacs mode so that apt-cache search will work as expected. > > Why it depends on ocaml-nox? > Because it needs development binaries like ocamlc. Ok, would recommend as suggested by Ralf be enough? I guess that some features of the emacs mode like, e.g. indentation, would not need ocamlc to be useful. > > As Sven I'm against the transitional purpose argument. I would go for no > > relationship at all (no Depends/Recommends/Suggests) from ocaml-nox to > Why would Suggests be a problem? I'd like to suggest tuareg-mode | > ocaml-mode. You're right, indeed it would not be a problem, go for it. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature