Re: opkg-buildpackage versus svn-buildpackage
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:52:19PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:35:27AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Notice that i vote against not keeping the orig tarballs in svn, since
> > we have no guarantee that they will stay wherever you got them, and as
> > i have noticed in the kernel svn archive, it is a pain, especially as
> > the tarball there is not the orig one, but modified by a script
> > removing non-free parts.
>
> I'm not proposing not to keep orig tarballs in svn, I was just curious
> about how svn-buildpackage work.
Ok then.
> Cheers.
>
> PS Sven: did you receive a couple of private mail of mine sent to your
> wanadoo address in the last few days? I got no reply.
No, i didn't. Strange.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: