Re: Bug#246846: Is this bug still present in lablgtk2 2.4.0+2005.02.18-1 ?
- To: Julien PUYDT <julien.puydt@laposte.net>, lablgtk@kaba.or.jp
- Cc: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>, 246846-quiet@bugs.debian.org, 246846-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#246846: Is this bug still present in lablgtk2 2.4.0+2005.02.18-1 ?
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 07:49:22 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20050508054922.GA24939@pegasos>
- Mail-followup-to: Julien PUYDT <julien.puydt@laposte.net>, lablgtk@kaba.or.jp, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>, 246846-quiet@bugs.debian.org, 246846-submitter@bugs.debian.org, debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 427D082C.2050505@laposte.net>
- References: <[🔎] 20050507141304.GA11111@pegasos> <[🔎] 427D082C.2050505@laposte.net>
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:25:48PM +0200, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> Sven Luther a écrit :
> >Hello,
> >
> >I would like to know if this bug was still present in the current version
> >of
> >lablgtk2 in sarge ?
>
> I don't know if it's the release in sarge, but I just rechecked the ones
> I pointed as problematic with the current lablgtk2 in unstable, and on
> those the result is:
Thanks for testing and your fast reply.
> * csview.ml:
> File "csview.ml", line 51, characters 4-6:
> Syntax error
Mmm.
> * events.ml:
> doesn't crash but gives things like:
> (ocaml:7938): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_text_view_start_selection_drag:
> assertion `text_view->selection_drag_handler == 0' failed
This seems not so much a problem as the rest of them.
> * tictactoe.ml:
> File "tictactoe.ml", line 30, characters 26-48:
> Unbound value GtkNew.make_new_widget
> * text/test_text.ml:
> File "text/test_text.ml", line 74, characters 11-25:
> Unbound value GText.tagtable
>
> So it obviously got much better since last year! The resulting errors
> must be tests which haven't been forward-ported.
Yes, this seems like a reasonable assumption. I have forwarded the lablgtk
upstream mailing list. Jacques (and others), do you have an insight in the
above ?
> Hope it helps,
>
> Snark on #ocaml
>
> PS: notice that I began a project in ocaml a month ago, and haven't been
> hit by a lablgtk limitation or bug (yet?).
Yep, makes sense if your above analysis of the problem is right.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: