[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: COCANWIKI - ExtLib



Excellent. Thank you.  That seems to have worked.  I will need to do
some more reading about subversion and the setup at debian then I will
probably understand the differences between:

svn co
svn://@svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/cocanwiki/trunk
cocanwiki

and 

svn co
svn://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/cocanwiki

Thanks again.

--JayR

On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 20:48 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 06:59:28PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:03:57AM -0700, Jay Riddle wrote:
> > > 
> > > Was the cocanwiki_1.3.11-1_all.deb supposed to have source in it?
> > > 
> > > Where do I locate the source for cocanwiki_1.3.11-1?  
> > 
> > The source for cocanwiki, and all other debs except for gregoriandate
> > which I'll send you separately, is in the alioth.debian.org
> > repository.
> > 
> > You will need Subversion client ("svn").  (It's a bit like CVS).
> > 
> > You'll need to register as a site user at http://alioth.debian.org
> > 
> > You'll need to join the Debian OCaml Maintainers Task Force
> > (https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-ocaml-maint/).  I'm to be
> > honest not sure whether anyone can join this, or whether you need to
> > get Sven or Stefano to approve you.  I'm quite sure they will approve
> > you if you just ask.
> 
> Yep, we have to approve, but ...
> 
> > Then ... now I can't find the documentation about how to check stuff
> > out of subversion, which is why I'm x-posting this to the
> > debian-ocaml-maint list.
> > 
> > 	Debian OCaml people:
> > 
> > 	How does Jay get read-only access to the subversion repo?
> 
>   svn co svn://@svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/cocanwiki/trunk cocanwiki
> 
> Should do it, if not there is a serious problem somewhere.
> 
> There is also the web interface from http://svn.debian.org.
> 
> Write access is only needed if you modify stuff and want to checkit in.
> 
> Friendly,
> 
> Sven Luther
> 



Reply to: