On Thursday 24 March 2005 22:26, Julien Cristau wrote: > On 24/03/2005-20:10, George Danchev wrote: > > Right I've already saw that and that's what I replied [2] to his mail, > > but Goswin insist of adding us to Packages-arch-specific list [3]. In > > fact I didn't find any justifications that ara needs to be listed there. > > Hints where to read abot that ? > > Packages-arch-specific is used by wanna-build to know which packages the > buildds shouldn't try to build. Since ara builds no arch-specific > debs for arches without ocamlopt, adding it to P-a-s will save time on > the buildds. This has no other consequences. Thanks for the explanation. I didn't know the details around that procedure. Looks like someone has to inform authors of that file. As for the "build-depending on a virtual package possible random breakage" I would suggest to have arch-specific Build-Depends as the following: ..., ocaml-native-compilers (>= vesion ) [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 powerpc sparc], ocaml-best-compilers (>= version) [m68k mips mipsel s390 sh], ... -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <danchev.fccf.net/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
Attachment:
pgpQOv5Xb2rY_.pgp
Description: PGP signature