[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Building and cleaning the manual in advi



Hello Sven,
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 05:25:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 05:04:09PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Hello Sven,
> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:21:42PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 03:45:31PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:

> > Any news on this? I yet do not see anything in the repository and
> > according to
> > http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW-summary.html
> > 
> > advi is not in NEW?
> 
> Ah, ... need to do this now.

The change in the repository I see, but nothing in NEW. 

> $ linuxinfo
> Linux pegasos2 2.6.10-powerpc #1 Fri Mar 4 10:32:57 CET 2005
> One 7447/7457, altivec supported CHRP Pegasos2 999MHz processor, 665.60 total
> bogomips, 512M RAM
> System library 2.3.2

Great.
 
> Seems to work fine. I will check on ibook and oldworld/prep later on, but the
> augsbourg 8-way power5 machine breaks i think : 

My ibook works, the oldworld/prep would be nice.

> $ ./linuxinfo
> Linux trick 2.6.10 #1 SMP Fri Jan 28 10:01:45 CET 2005
> Unknown POWER5 (gr) CHRP IBM,9124-720 1656MHz processor, 0.00 total bogomips,
> 7M RAM
> System library 2.3.2
> 
> The bogo mips value is wrong, as is the RAM amount (should be 7GB), and there
> are 8 procs.

Ok, the new version in unstable should report the number of CPUs
correct. The bogomips value I cannot determine, since this machine
does not print in in /proc/cpuinfo. (If you know another file in /proc
or somewhere, which prints this, I might add it).

Can you run

   ls -l /proc/kcore
   ls -l /proc/meminfo

on this machine? 

Thanks.

       Helge


-- 
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys.           Helge.Kreutzmann@itp.uni-hannover.de
                       gpg signed mail preferred 
    64bit GNU powered                  http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
       Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/

Attachment: pgptKSfkrKHRO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: