Re: [damien.doligez@inria.fr: [Caml-list] announcement: Objective Caml 3.08.3]
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:23:17PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> Hello,
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:09:27PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > > If you made a debian repository on alioth, i propose to rebuild ocaml
> > > package for arch i386 ( it was a big problem for me last time, because
> > > i386 wasn't build in unstable, because of latency with lablgtk ).
> >
> > Well, this is the same I proposed with the exception I propose using
> > experimental instead of an alioth repository.
> >
> > I think experimental is more suitable since it is more "official" than
> > an alioth repository.
> >
>
> Humm, well i don't disagree to your statement. There is only one problem
> : do i have the right to upload to experimental ( considering i am not a
> DD ) ?
>
> ( if i can, i agree on the fact that an alioth repo is not mandatory ).
Well, we had the following reply from vorlon :
20:33 < vorlon> aba: I told him last time he asked, that ocaml is
self-contained, so as long as he doesn't have anything broken in testing
(which he currently does, I think -- I just saw an RC bug on mldonkey),
it doesn't matter to me.
So, this basically is a green light, provided the RC bug against mldonkey is
fixed. Mmm, there are two of them
Sylvain, can you comment on this ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: