Re: [email@example.com: [Caml-list] announcement: Objective Caml 3.08.3]
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:23:17PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:09:27PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > > If you made a debian repository on alioth, i propose to rebuild ocaml
> > > package for arch i386 ( it was a big problem for me last time, because
> > > i386 wasn't build in unstable, because of latency with lablgtk ).
> > Well, this is the same I proposed with the exception I propose using
> > experimental instead of an alioth repository.
> > I think experimental is more suitable since it is more "official" than
> > an alioth repository.
> Humm, well i don't disagree to your statement. There is only one problem
> : do i have the right to upload to experimental ( considering i am not a
> DD ) ?
No, but we can sponsor you.
> ( if i can, i agree on the fact that an alioth repo is not mandatory ).
Well, the other thing for a non-experimental repo is that all the NEW packages
can make it into it.