Re: ocaml-http 0.1.0-1 uploaded
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 04:53:59PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 12:23:09PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 10:03:17AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > I tried to build approx (did someone already commit to uploading this one ?)
> > > > and it couldn't find ocaml-http (nor ocaml-syslog), i guess both of them are
> > > > in NEW, but i couldn't find ocaml-http on the svn repo on alioth, Stefano, is
> > > > this an oversight ? And could you correct it ?
> > >
> > > You could find ocaml-http on its home page
> > >
> > > http://www.bononia.it/~zack/ocaml-http.en.html
> > >
> > > along with i386 and powerpc .deb. Also, it is a debian native package so
> > > if you want build it from source just do debuild in the "upstream"
> > > tarball. For packages maintained only by me I do not use the svn repo,
> > > if you want to checkin ocaml-http there do it, but I doubt I will
> > > remember to commit my changes there :)
> >
> > Yep, i got this one, altough ocurl seems to have problems.
> >
> > > > Also, given that NEW seems to be unofficialy frozen, i think it would make
> > > > sense to setup a ocaml-related repo on our alioth project. It will not be
> > > > autobuilt, but i guess those of us wanting to do it can build it for their
> > > > arches (well probably mostly x86 and powerpc). Any comment about this ?
> > >
> > > Yes, that would be great, but I fear that we have to manually update
> > > Packages.gz and similar, or you believe we could run a mini-dinstall on
> > > alioth?
> >
> > Maybe, or simply run dpgk-scanpackages each hour in a cron job or something.
> >
> > Friendly,
> >
> > Sven Luther
> >
>
> Take a look at debarchiver. I use it on my own mini repo.
Maybe we could setup a real dinstall-like queue, and i could setup a
autobuilder for powerpc on my always-on machine, and we could do automated
sarge backports or something after the release.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: